macintosh.world | Log In | Register
Today | News | Books | Recipes | Notes | YouTube | QuickTake
Translate | Wiki | Browse | Maps | Reference | Reddit | About

Back to Reddit

Tigers in India

by /u/TuneMountain4141 | 107 comments | 2026-06-16T04:57:37+00:00 Central

Open on Reddit

Lightweight Preview

Full Size

Comments

/u/Criux_
Male tigers also raise orphaned cubs in VERY rare cases
if the mother died
/u/Critical_Buddy_2145
I've heard male cats just slime the young ones to reduce
competition 🥀
/u/DiscoPotato69
Yeah hence the "VERY rare"
/u/Ok-Wolverine-3238
They prefer medium rare and well done
/u/hates_stupid_people
Very common when a male lion takes over a pride and
similar. But tigers are more solitary so it happens on
very rare occasions with them.

When it comes to house cats it can be more common,
depending on the situation.
/u/Critical_Buddy_2145
Still it does make sense for a lone male tiger to slime
them kids for easier future
/u/Awkward-Custard3907
they dont slime the female ones
/u/riftshioku
It definitely happens in house cats, especially if
they're feral and don't have all their needs met.
Significantly less likely with your average indoor only
cat, but it does still happen.
/u/Critical_Buddy_2145
Diabolical , nature can be pretty harsh It just shows
humans aint anything different, or that consciousness
makes us 'evil' for eating meat etc.

If a pack of lions or polar bears had sophisticated
weapons they wouldn't give a single sht before using it
/u/Radzila
Usually another male tiger's cubs, not their own
/u/Select_Newspaper_108
Wouldn't shock me if male Tigers are more likely to do
this than other cats due to the species status. Tigers
are one of the most endangered cats in the world
/u/Procyon-Sceletus
You... you think the tigers are aware theyre endangered?
/u/Takemyfishplease
Duh, how else would they know to goose the numbers?

It's all a scam by big wildlife.
/u/PaarthurnaxUchiha
You are confusing intellectual knowledge with biological
knowledge. We never said tigers read global conservation
data. We are saying their bodies are chemical engines.
When their habitats are destroyed and they are crowded
together, their biology reacts. Epigenetic switches
flip, stress hormones skyrocket, and their fertility
drops.

Their bodies biologically 'know' they are in a crisis
state because nature has hardwired them to chemically
respond to environmental collapse. You don't need a
spreadsheet to be in survival mode.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/arti
cles/10.3389/fendo.2025.1571111/pdf
/u/Budget_Avocado6204
You don't need to be aware to cement some behavior. As
long as it increases the odds of survival or just
doesn't harm them it can get passed down.
/u/entropy_bucket
Won't they be aware of the lack of mates?
/u/Select_Newspaper_108
Animals are more intricate than some think they are.
Especially apex predators, they have a verrry scientific
way of operating
/u/sai-kiran
Bro the animals are intricate as in, geee that river
levels seems to be rising, oh its so hot may be I need
to go into shade and pull my kids in etc.

Not conducting international studies on tiger
population counts.
/u/Select_Newspaper_108
They're obviously not counting population it's more
like... "geee, I have no tigers bordering me north and
east, my territory is huge, it's tough to find females"
/u/joey-jo_jo-jr
Tigers are endangered because they've been expatriated
from many areas. In the places where they do exist they
are often locally overpopulated.

Any subconscious awareness of their environment would
suggest to them that there are more tigers than ever.
/u/RomanArchitect
What does slime mean here? I
/u/MCB1317
A giant king-like deer once raised a young fawn after
his mother was shot by a hunter.
/u/FuzzyFrogFish
They've also been observed playing step father to cubs
father by other males. Of course it's incredibly rare
but it has happened
/u/unk214
She takes my money, while I'm in need!
/u/fondledbydolphins
It makes sense for almost any species to do this, so
long as food and mating opportunities are plentiful.
/u/unhinged_diabetes
In major cases they harm the child
/u/STEPPYthebest
Have y'all wondered if other animals also have their own
pets
/u/Vermillion_glitch
Some spiders keep pet frogs :3
/u/jey__bee7
Stop that's so cuteeee Wait but how does that work😭
don't frogs just eat the spider?
/u/NatriureticFactor
It is like a mutual relationship between them, mostly
between frogs and large tarantulas. Tarantula provides
shelter and defend the tiny frogs against predators like
snakes. The tiny frogs live in the spider's burrow and
eat small invertebrates like ants that threaten spider's
egg sacs.

These frogs are not that big to eat the tarantulas.
/u/SalsaRice
If memory serves, the frogs evolved something to make
the spider just completely ignore them. The spider
doesn't interact with the frog, it's presence in it's
web/burrow is enough to scare away most frog predators.
/u/NatriureticFactor
You are correct, the tarantula recognizes frog's
specific chemical signals and knows not to eat them.
These are proved to be evolutionary features in the
relationship.
/u/lucashc90
So, are you telling me the frog just "emits" smol pet
energy and the spiders just goes "Yeah, that's right!"
/u/NatriureticFactor
Well, you can say that. It's the effect of the kind of
relationship they have, so they started to pass on these
effects on newer generations and now they know what to
do.
/u/Mind-The-Mines
Like Juggernaut and the fat kid in Deadpool 2.
/u/scrapped_data
https://preview.redd.it/v307ytrhhn7h1.jpeg?width=2160&fo
rmat=pjpg&auto=webp&s=882416ea808facaee6dbbc6aaa96538498
132571
/u/jey__bee7
https://preview.redd.it/th9f6gcaln7h1.jpeg?width=736&for
mat=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f7f9b15da1f2fdbe7401e5a8d33b1531453
b53a9
/u/scrapped_data
My lady, Tarantula. The wicked snake pursue me most
greedily. Might I seek shelter in thy burrow (DMs).

https://preview.redd.it/s09gcfvg1o7h1.jpeg?width=1024&f
ormat=pjpg&auto=webp&s=171e2a49fb647b80df9e03dc3a2da3e43
ca6761a
/u/abrahamsen
arachnophobia_warning
/u/Throwaway-4230984
No need to eat the whole thing at once, he can eat a leg
a day or something like this
/u/Overall-Register9758
I read a story about a spider who had a pet pig
/u/SeriousDirt
Not pets but ants does something like ranching.
/u/GrowingPeepers
What does aphid milk taste like?
/u/Own_Natural_2959
I'll be back soon, my hibiscus plant has got some.
/u/frflana
apparently there are slave-making ants lol
/u/clawsoon
Social amoeba farm, too:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09668

They are some of the most fascinating organisms around.
The more you learn about them, the more interesting they
get.
/u/JackRabbit-
Koko the gorilla rather famously kept a few kittens as
pets.

But with animals it's rather difficult to apply the
term I think, "pet" implies ownership and even when
different animals have a close bond it's not like they
take them to the vet, house them, or feed them.
/u/Sad_Cucumber_9139
A pretty close one is Clownfish and Sea anemone,
clownfish literally feed the Sea anemone
/u/NotJoeFast
Some monkeys keep dogs with them. Dog gets food and
company and in return they protect the monkey colony.
/u/-Thisismyrealname
That sounds awfully familiar
/u/OuterWildsVentures
do the monkeys pet the dogs tho
/u/ManWordsMan
Wait till you find out some keep slaves. some species of
Ants keep slaves. This behavior involves raiding
neighboring colonies, abducting their larvae or pupae,
and forcing the hatched ants to perform all the daily
labor in the slaver colony
/u/SeriousDirt
The more you know about ants, the crazier they are.
/u/crowieforlife
It's not really "forcing" more like tricking. The
invading ants produce pheromones mimicking those of the
queen of the invaded hive. Ants smell queen pheromone,
ants follow queen pheromone. It's unlikely that they're
even aware that they're actually working for the enemy.

Even their own queen is more of a slaver than a friend.
There are species of ants, where all females are born
fertile, and the queen personally waits for them to
hatch so she can cut off their genitals, forcing them to
become workers and making them unable to usurp her.
/u/Various_Ad1416
In zoos cheetahs get emotional support labradors 😭.
/u/QuantumFluxSpaghetti
read about Amazon Ants & Blood-Red Ants if you're
interested.
/u/thrillho145
Baboons keep pet dogs, but they're pretty cruel to them
/u/Prasiatko
Some urban monkey troops coexist with the street cats
since they are disposed to pet furry things and the cats
like being petted.
/u/Electrical_Lake8083
BBC has documented two tigress sharing similar feeding
ground co parenting each other kids and also a male
tiger instead of attacking the cubs to mate again,
instead the cubs and the mother named Goma tiger
actually welcomed him rubbing their heads and all these
animals are more social then we ever imagined and all
this was documented in Sauraha, Nepal
/u/ledhendrix
If tigers start rolling in packs, everyone and
everything needs to watch out.
/u/Desperate-Opening365
Tigers seem to be mentally evolving.

Time to change the king?
/u/bioskope
In Asia...Tiger has been King for a long time.
/u/Realistic-Goose9558
We stopped killing the fuck out of them and we reduced
the size of their habitat.
/u/Lemonwizard
Eusocial behavior is actually heavily favored by natural
selection when it emerges. The most obvious example is
humans, whose complex cooperation has caused a
population explosion which makes us account for 99.997%
of all extant apes. Colony insects are also vastly more
populous than non-colony insects in the same ecosystem.
Herds benefit prey animals and packs benefit predator
animals.

Killing the competition's babies may help one
individual improve their reproductive success, but a
predisposition to assist other members of the species
will benefit the species as a whole.
/u/Desperate-Opening365
Yeah it is interesting to see how humans are slowly
getting more and more hostile while other animals known
to be cannibal and violet are growing benevolent
/u/Lemonwizard
This hostility is not a product of evolution - it's
being deliberately manufactured by malicious actors who
control most large media outlets. Evolution does not
work that fast.
/u/IfatallyflawedI
Yep, the two mom shared 5 cubs between them
/u/Neo_Ronin1331
India has single handedly saved tigers from extinction.
Pulled off one of the greatest conservation comebacks
ever, growing its wild tiger population from a
terrifying low of 1,411 in 2006 to an estimated 3,682
today. Because of this massive turnaround, India alone
is now home to roughly 75% of all wild tigers on Earth.
/u/GuiltyEidolon
Greatest comeback is the California Condor. 22
individuals - total. They were all trapped and brought
into captivity to be part of a breeding program and keep
them from dying. Up to 607 individuals, with about a
third being in breeding programs in captivity still.
/u/R1donis
"Ok, there are 22 of you, we are not letting anyone out
untill all females are pregnant"
/u/BeatleJuice1st
Really?! Now every Incel wants to become a condor.
/u/Qweesdy
Birds don't get pregnant - they poop out disposable
wombs instead.
/u/SpannerFrew
I raise you the Chatham Island robin which was down to 5
in 1980 with only one breeding pair. Link
/u/Hippopotasaurus-Rex
Another key component to this is banning leaded ammo. It
took something like 20 years to happen after the SD Zoo
and others involved started trying but that was a huge
part of their demise. It still is in fact because
neighboring states still allow leaded ammo and birds
don't know about state lines.
/u/Bruce-7892
It's weird because we probably think of humans as the
only ones that are altruistic, but animals can have
friends and "pets" even from different species if they
don't see them as a threat or a meal.
/u/gavin280
We (animal behaviourists, neuroscientists, etc) actually
don't think humans are the only altruistic species, and
we haven't for some time.

You're 100% correct that many other species exhibit
behaviours that are "altruistic" by any reasonable
definition.
/u/Frooctose
What instances of true altruism occur in nature?
/u/Bruce-7892
That's impossible to say with certainty because you
can't ask an animal why it chose to do something but
animals like orcas, ducks and even donkeys have attacked
animals that were preying on a completely different
species. This could be because they are conditioned to
see certain animals as a threat, or maybe they were
being protective for all we know.

When caring for another animal it could be instinctual.
Animals like dogs are social and communal because their
survival depends on being part of a pack in nature.
/u/TheKnightMadder
Humpback whales happily intervene to save other animals
from being hunted by orca. They'll travel long distances
just to get into fights with orca to save seals,
dolphins, other whales or whale calves.

Of course orca eat humpback calves, so it may be more
about fucking up orca than anything else. You've got to
respect the hate if so.

There's also reports of humpbacks doing things like
trying to hide divers under their fins when sharks are
nearby, just like they would with a baby humpback.
/u/Frooctose
That's pretty interesting, I don't know enough about
whales to comment on it. People online think it's due to
the whales being confused, but I'm not sure.
/u/Decloudo
We are animals, we are part of nature (even if we ignore
it).

We evolved to be able to do this this the same way any
other animal did to be able what they can. Lots of
overlap.

But if you ask "what other animal does this the exact
same way humans do" you automatically introduce a bias.
Cause you deny to see it if its not "how humans do it".
/u/MurkyTrainer7953
My cat believes he adopted me. Brings me toys that he
"catches" occasionally as "food". He believes his human
is an idiot and incapable of hunting for themself.
Sometimes he licks me too cause apparently I can't bathe
myself.
/u/PresentRaspberry6814
Lots of animals raise others young, chickens and cats
for example domestically.
/u/SlogurkTheOverslime
Ooo interesting, have other species been significantly
outperforming humans in different forms of "altruism"?
/u/OldWorldDesign
have other species been significantly outperforming
humans in different forms of "altruism"?

Depends on what kind of constraints you're using to
frame the question.

If we define altruism as doing something for the good
of another without any clear immediate return then we
see that often. Octopi and some varieties of fish will
help each other hunt, sometimes the octopus gets the
prey fish and sometimes it's the other predator

https://www.science.org/content/article/some-octopuses-
treat-fish-hunting-buddies

Often it's much more distant, like cats and chickens
who grow up together

https://insightfulblog.com/can-you-keep-chickens-if-you
-have-cats/

Some people define altruism as never having any
benefit, which I believe is a bad-faith tactic of trying
to act like altruism doesn't exist at all. Such framing
means that even feeling good transforms human altruism
into selfishness, which is nonsense.

Social species raising each others' young is not just
pro-social, but reduces the burden on any one caregiver
and makes survival of the entire group higher. That's a
distant benefit which I don't think negates the
existence of "altruism". It just means it's a complex
reality.
/u/gavin280
That's a great question and I honestly don't know the
answer. It's tough to say exactly how we would measure
"altruistic performance".

There are some examples of largely analogous atruistic
behaviours (e.g. raising someone else's offspring) where
we've measured the frequency in different animal
populations, and we could statistically compare with
humans. As it turns out, you can point to specific
examples where nonhuman animals engage in the behaviour
far more extensively, such as ants.

But is the simple frequency of a behaviour really a
good measure of "altruistic performance"? It strikes me
that we may also want to ask what the cost of a given
altruistic behaviour is to individual survival and
probably a host of other questions. Going back to ants,
SO much else about their entire social structure and
nervous systems.
/u/Bruce-7892
I was generalizing. Most people probably don't think
that, but we are always intrigued when we see a warthog
hanging out with a meerkat for example (although that
actually happens in real life).
/u/fastforwardfunction
Many people consider "altruism" to not exist and believe
humans and other animals can't be truly altruistic.

When trying to define "altruism", the definitions
quickly become self-defeating and perhaps paradoxical.
From a schematic, scientific, and biological view, it's
not a very useful term.
/u/Bruce-7892
So a relative or close friend who willingly puts
themselves in a life or death situation to help someone
they are close to isn't altruistic? You can search for
selfish reasons for them to do so all day, but you are
being speculative. To me its not that much of a stretch
to think some people want to help certain others at
their own expense.
/u/ShibamKarmakar
Elephants 100% think of us as their "pets."
/u/Bruce-7892
IDK about that one. I think if they grew up interacting
with people in a healthy environment they'd be fine but
they are still undomesticated animals. Google "The
friendliest hippo" and you can find a mini documentary
about people who casually hang out with a hippo that
comes and goes and even enters their house and gets hand
fed. Try that with a random wild hippo and you are going
to get turned into road kill.
/u/Overbaron
we probably think of humans as the only ones that are
altruistic

What makes you say that? Have you heard of this animal
called "dog"?
/u/Anuki_iwy
Meanwhile lions, who typically get twins, will abandon
the other if one cub dies. Therefore tigers are the
better cars.
/u/Anuki_iwy
Tabbies are Standard issue cars. Are tigers standard
issue lorries? 🤔
/u/AntiSocialSingh
https://giphy.com/gifs/L69hWWDRdc0NQ66pwZ
/u/the_orange_alligator
If a cat is a cat a tiger is a truck
/u/legitimate_maybe999
https://giphy.com/gifs/KEVODnr6kaJws
/u/stupled
Better than Jaguars, those are lemmons.
/u/preda1or
https://giphy.com/gifs/LSSf6hSR1rmR7mBiOH
/u/Radzila
While the behavior is a documented evolutionary
strategy, abandonment is not an absolute rule. Many
mothers fiercely protect and raise single cubs
/u/47-AGENT
Child support does not come with western terms looks
like
/u/idontknowhowtopark
I mean, they are gorgeous.
/u/squidgytree
They probably faced pressure from their Indian parents
to settle down and have kids
/u/Shrimp_kisses
Not a step dad, a dad who stepped up
/u/A-Lewd-Khajiit
Don't the females usually raise the cubs?
/u/Shrimp_kisses
You're asking me as a Khajiit? You smoking scooma rm?
/u/A-Lewd-Khajiit
Skooma is a way of life (don't do drugs kids)